Warning: What follows is an example of an editorial issue that would be considered beyond-the-pale boring and nerdy for most people (even some editors!) but is positively thrilling to me.
I emailed this query to the editor I'm working with on this cookbook:
Is it OK to say something like "Bake for 25 minutes, until set" or should it be "Bake for 25 minutes, or until set"? I always think that if they're giving the time first, the "goal" should be preceded by "or"; if they're giving the goal first, then the time should be preceded by "about" (e.g., "Bake until set, about 25 minutes"). Too picky?
To which she replied:
[Other Editor] and I discussed it, and we agree with what you're proposing, and don't think it's too picky at all! (Even though it *should* be obvious, variations in oven temps and the like could really trip up someone who took a specific time instruction literally.)
I just can't stop grinning.
Chef Stephan, one of my favourite teachers always wished every recipe threw away the times and only said 'OR UNTIL'. Or until browned, or until set, or until soft, or until crisp, etc.
Having taught many a Harvard MBA in my rec classes I can assure you that type A personalities are often VERY hung up on the times in recipes and they don't pay enough attention to 'or until'.
Good for you for fighting the good fight.
Posted by: jo | March 24, 2008 at 01:15 PM
Thank you! I like to know an approximate time just for planning purposes (Are we talking 8 minutes here, or 48 minutes?), but we've all had the experience when something is done long before the stated time or not even close to being being done when the timer goes off. I'm more confident in the kitchen than I used to be, but I know that new cooks really want everything to go "by the book."
Posted by: Karen | March 24, 2008 at 01:38 PM
Not too picky or boring at all! I was just reading in some cooking magazine yesterday about the importance of distinguishing between, for example, "1 cup of cooked rice" and "1 cup of rice, cooked." It makes a huge difference.
Posted by: Elena | March 24, 2008 at 01:45 PM
Oh, I love this - and the care and concern that go into making cooking directions very clear. I am learning to cook and sometimes even what should be the most basic directions have made it difficult for me to proceed. I personally appreciate the goal first ("Bake until set, about 25 minutes.") THEN, I get it!
One time, in my early 20s, I started a recipe that required using a Dutch oven. Sadly, I had NO idea what that was. Oh my!
Posted by: Kathleen | March 24, 2008 at 02:49 PM
Elena: Oh yes, that's very important. 1 cup of raw rice yields more than 1 cup when cooked. Similarly, 1 cup of chopped walnuts is A LOT more walnuts than 1 cup of walnuts, chopped.
Posted by: Karen | March 24, 2008 at 04:18 PM
I love this stuff - Ted and I discuss tiny proofreading points frequently.
Posted by: Liz | March 24, 2008 at 04:40 PM
I had a similar grinning moment the other day. I was playing golf with my friend's husband and three of the best lady golfers at my club. I was playing exceptionally well, to my amazement. One of the ladies said, "I would love to be your partner in a tournament anytime." When we pulled away in our golf cart, I said to my friend's husband, "I am SO turned on right now!"
So I absolutely understand how you are feeling. It's after five...have a glass of wine!
Posted by: Di | March 24, 2008 at 05:02 PM
THIS is what editing is all about. Of COURSE you need the "or"! Congrats on that validation!
And thanks for letting us be editor voyeurs for a brief moment. :)
Posted by: mommyralf | March 24, 2008 at 08:36 PM
Oh, Karen, I could kiss you for that! You don't know how many times I've agonized about the fact that I'm messing up a recipe because it's not doing what it's supposed to do in the required amount of time.
Posted by: Margaret | March 24, 2008 at 09:29 PM
Dude, this job is right up your tree!
Posted by: Naomi | March 25, 2008 at 09:13 PM