Just because I'm a tree-hugging bleeding-heart liberal pinko commie Massachusetts Democrat doesn't mean that I don't occasionally agree with a Christian conservative. (via Susan)
Comments
I have no problem with them continuing on being "disenfranchised." But neither do I have a problem with splitting the delegates down the middle and seating the delegation at the convention. Neither do I have a problem with a do-over of some kind. In fact, the only solution I think is absolutely untenable is taking the results as-is.
How exactly is this disenfranchisement anyway? We're talking about nominating a candidate for a political party, not voting on who actually gets elected to office. It speaks volumes about Hillary's character that she can get up there again and again with a straight face and suggest that they seat the delegates as is. And today there are reports that her large donors are threatening to ask the DNC to return their donations if they don't seat those delegations! Am I the only one who is tired of the Clintons?
I have no problem with them continuing on being "disenfranchised." But neither do I have a problem with splitting the delegates down the middle and seating the delegation at the convention. Neither do I have a problem with a do-over of some kind. In fact, the only solution I think is absolutely untenable is taking the results as-is.
Posted by: scott | March 14, 2008 at 03:37 PM
How exactly is this disenfranchisement anyway? We're talking about nominating a candidate for a political party, not voting on who actually gets elected to office. It speaks volumes about Hillary's character that she can get up there again and again with a straight face and suggest that they seat the delegates as is. And today there are reports that her large donors are threatening to ask the DNC to return their donations if they don't seat those delegations! Am I the only one who is tired of the Clintons?
Posted by: Elena | March 15, 2008 at 05:17 PM